Monday, September 29, 2014

Focus On: Shift Dresses

By Sherri, sewbettyanddot

Question: what is easy to wear, comfortable, versatile, and cute? Answer: a shift dress!

Shifts as we commonly refer to them today are, in essence, a columnar-shaped dress with no defined waist. They can be mini or to the knee. They are most typically sleeveless, but there are definitely shifts with sleeves. Compare this shape to the sheath dress (the two are often confused: the sheath hugs the body while the shift does not).

When I began researching this post, I thought it would be easy since shift dresses are, well, "easy." The history of the shift and its development into the garment we know today is actually rather complicated--and fascinating.

It all goes back to the chemise, a plain, straight garment, usually of a lightweight fabric such as muslin. Chemises were the primary undergarment worn in the eighteenth (and part of the nineteenth) century. They were worn next to the skin and so absorbed sweat and body oils; they could be easily laundered (well, as "easy" as doing laundry was in the days before wash machines and running water!) while elaborate dresses adorned with trims and jewels could not. Marie Antoinette--always a risk taker--briefly popularized a garment called la gaulle, which consisted of light and airy unconstructed (for the most part) layers of muslin. Please remember that upper-class women typically wore dresses with very tight torsos with panniers over the hips and voluminous skirts. Fashionable ladies of course followed suit, but the French people were scandalized: they felt the dress looked like a chemise, and they were horrified that their queen would wear her underwear in public (Queen Marie was already not at all popular with the general public due to her somewhat eccentric ways and her quest to find some simplicity away from the over-the-top atmosphere at the French court). The garment became known as a chemise à la reine (the queen's chemise).
1. Chemise (3rd quarter 18th century, France). Collection The Costume Institute, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Gift of Mrs. Dudley Wadsworth, 1941
2. Marie-Antoinette en chemise, Louise Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun, 1783 (courtesy Wikipedia)

3. Neoclassical (empire style) dress, worn by Felicité-Louise-Julie-Constance de Durfort, portrait by Merry-Joseph Blondel 
(courtesy Wikipedia)

The end of the eighteenth century saw a Neoclassical revival in art and fashion, and women turned to tunic-shaped dresses (as seen on women painted on Greek and Roman pottery) that were fitted at the bust and fell straight with no waist constriction. The style was popularized by Empress Josephine, so the English began to call this an "empire silhouette." In the Regency period in England (first decades of the nineteenth century--think Jane Austen) this style of dress was often made of white or light-colored fabric, which denoted a higher economic class as only ladies of leisure could keep a white dress clean. As fashion is always changing, this silhouette fell out of style for about 100 years...but in the 1920s, enter the flapper. The long, straight dress with very little waist definition (and less restrictive undergarments--good-bye corsets!) was again en vogue. Not only was this style easy to wear, but it also signified the wider freedoms women began to enjoy, including the right to vote (the 19th Amendment was passed in the U.S. in 1920; New Zealand and Australia were early adopters, passing universal suffrage laws in the late 19th century).
1. Dress (1805-1810), probably British. Collection The Costume Institute, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York
2. Dress (1924), United States. Brooklyn Museum Costume Collection at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Gift of the Brooklyn Museum, 2009; Gift of Mrs. Fred May, 1957
3. Silk sacque-back dress, 1956, Saks Fifth Avenue. Brooklyn Museum Costume Collection at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Gift of the Brooklyn Museum, 2009; Gift of Louise K. McGann, 1977



Sack dresses available in a Sears catalog--note that they are called chemises, harking back to the beginning! 
Ad from a Sears catalog, late 1950s. From Shih, Joy. Fashionable Clothing from the Sears Catalogs, Late 1950's (Schiffer Publishing, 1997); via plosin.com

As the Depression hit, the flapper lifestyle (and silhouette) faded away. After the privations of World War II, Christian Dior's exuberant New Look (tiny cinched waist--more constricting undergarments here--and enormous full skirts) was a sensation. Because every action has a reaction, designers then created a much simpler silhouette with the "sack dress," which, as its name implies, was a straight garment that hung from the shoulders with very little waist detailing (some of these dresses had a low belted back). Cristóbal Balenciaga is credited with the creation of this style in the late 1950s--the dress above (far right) is a knock-off from Saks. And on from this relaxed shape comes the shift as we know it, a child of the Youthquake and mod sixties. André Courrèges and Mary Quant were at the forefront of the mod shift dress revolution (both are credited with "inventing" the mini-dress). Finally, Lilly Pulitzer popularized the shape (and lovely colorful prints--the simple silhouette lends itself to prints and border prints) for suburban women everywhere; Jackie Kennedy was photographed in a Lilly and the rest was history. Shift dresses have never really gone out of style since the 1960s...they remain popular today, in part due to the variations within such a simple shape and the versatility they afford. 
1. Shift dress by André Courrèges (1960s). Courtesy FormidableMag.com
2. Mary Quant advertisement. Reblogged from TheCarnabetianArmy.tumblr.com
3. Lilly Pulitzer advertisement, early 1970s

Now, let's take a look at some lovely shift patterns from members of the Pattern Patter team on Etsy!
Top row, left to right: Simplicity 5918: MaddieModPatterns

Top row, left to right: Mary Quant: Butterick 3505: Fragolina
Top row, left to right: Vogue 6736: sydcam123

Shifts are so fab because they're very forgiving of any figure flaws AND they can easily transition from season to season: in the summer, all you need are some cute sandals and a shawl; in the fall, some tights and a sweater and you're on your way.

By the way, check out our Free Pattern Friday pattern to make a shift (check out all our Free Pattern Fridays, BTW!).

Which frock pattern would YOU shift for? Tell us in the comments!

(Main sources: Wikipedia, Victoria and Albert Museum [www.vam.ac.uk], The Metropolitan Museum of Art [www.metmuseum.org])

13 comments:

  1. Thanks for all the history! It's interesting to trace the evolution of a style. My favorites of these are the ones with appliques.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very cool! I love how the flapper dress evolved from the chemise.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Extremely well researched article. Thank you for sharing this information. I love the long, lean lines of the flapper dresses.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Love this style dress! Really great history! love it, thank for sharing this fabulous info. :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great blog post! Nothing like an easy, comfortable dress!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Amazing post! I love the history! I love the Mondrian Shift Dress.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Very interesting article...amazing how clothes we take for granted now had evolved, especially the naming of the garments. Well done Sherri !

    ReplyDelete
  8. Very thorough, nicely done and the picture examples are perfect. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wonderful article Sherri!
    I loved reading the history.
    There is a great dress out there for everyone!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Great Article! I love wearing "Tank" dresses, which is what I always call them.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This style is so sleek and simple at the same time. Love wearing them! Wonderful article.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Fabulous post, Sherri! I love the two tone mod shifts from the '60s. I just saw a gal wearing a short shift with cute country boots at the grocery store yesterday... made my day. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  13. So interesting and love shifts - my closet is full of them. Must admit I would like to see a close up of those monsters on

    ReplyDelete